0012. Family format: the upstream asks file's path set in kb.toml
Context and Problem Statement
The shared scripts read a KB's upstream asks (upstream.yaml, gaps and asks for a vendor) from a
fixed folder named after one vendor, and the template doesn't ship its schema. A KB about another
vendor can't use the data file without changing the shared scripts, which the format forbids. This
KB keeps its asks as a Markdown table (liquidware/upstream.md) for
now. Should the path move into kb.toml?
Considered Options
- An optional
upstreampath inkb.toml, read bykblib.py, withupstream.schema.jsonand the generated table shipped in the template - Keep the fixed path and let other KBs use Markdown
Decision Outcome
Chosen option: "A path in kb.toml", because kb.toml already holds every per-KB setting, and the
upstream asks are part of the family's shared layout.
Consequences
- Good, because every KB can track vendor asks as data with the same schema and checks.
- Bad, because it's a change to the shared scripts and template, adopted by PR in every KB.
More Information
A family format change, raised with 2ndbrain, which owns the format
(2ndbrain). Once adopted, this KB moves
its table to liquidware/upstream.yaml.
Two more per-KB values sit in the shared scripts today and could move to kb.toml in the same
change: the code languages the prior-art check searches (Python and TypeScript; this KB would want
Bicep and PowerShell), and the examples in the known-errors schema's descriptions.